Early English Printed Sermons


The combate between the flesh and spirit. As also the wofull with-drawing of the Spirit of God, with the causes thereof: and walking in, and after the Spirit, together with the blessednesse thereof. Being the summe and substance of XXVII. sermons: preached a little before his death, by that faithfull servant of Christ, Mr. Christopher Love, late minister of the Gospel at Lawrence Jury London. To which is added the Christians directory tending to direct him in the various conditions that God may cast him into. In XV. sermons.

Love, Christopher, 1618-1651
Publisher: Printed by T R E M for John Rothwell at the Fountain and Bear in Goldsmiths row in Cheapside
Place of Publication: London
Publication Year: 1654
Approximate Era: Interregnum
TCP ID: A88580 ESTC ID: R202772 STC ID: L3145
Subject Headings: Sermons, English -- 17th century;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections View All References



Segment 2727 located on Page 161

< Previous Segment       Next Segment >

Location Text Standardized Text Parts of Speech
In-Text and therefore sayes he, I had not known lust to be sin, if the Law had not said, Thou shalt not covet; and Therefore Says he, I had not known lust to be since, if the Law had not said, Thou shalt not covet; cc av vvz pns31, pns11 vhd xx vvn n1 pc-acp vbi n1, cs dt n1 vhd xx vvn, pns21 vm2 xx vvi;
Note 0 Rom. 7.7. Rom. 7.7. np1 crd.




Quotations and Paraphrases (QP)

Adjacent References with Relevance: Romans 7.7; Romans 7.7 (AKJV)
Only the top predictions per textual unit are considered for adjacency. An adjacent reference is located either in the same or an immediately neighboring segment/note as a given query reference. A reference is relevant to the query if they are identical, parallel texts of each other, or one is a known cross references of the other.
Verse & Version Verse Text Text Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note Cosine Similarity Score Cross Encoder Score Okapi BM25 Score
Romans 7.7 (AKJV) - 4 romans 7.7: for i had not knowen lust, except the law had said, thou shalt not couet. and therefore sayes he, i had not known lust to be sin, if the law had not said, thou shalt not covet False 0.885 0.933 9.219
Romans 7.7 (Geneva) - 4 romans 7.7: for i had not knowen lust, except the lawe had sayd, thou shalt not lust. and therefore sayes he, i had not known lust to be sin, if the law had not said, thou shalt not covet False 0.872 0.916 5.447
Romans 7.7 (Tyndale) - 4 romans 7.7: for i had not knowne what lust had meant excepte the lawe had sayde thou shalt not lust. and therefore sayes he, i had not known lust to be sin, if the law had not said, thou shalt not covet False 0.851 0.879 5.073
Romans 7.7 (ODRV) romans 7.7: what shal we say then? is the law sinne? god forbid. but sinne i did not know, but by the law: for concupiscence i knew not, vnlesse the law did day: thou shalt not couet. and therefore sayes he, i had not known lust to be sin, if the law had not said, thou shalt not covet False 0.824 0.68 3.992
Romans 7.7 (Geneva) - 4 romans 7.7: for i had not knowen lust, except the lawe had sayd, thou shalt not lust. and therefore sayes he, i had not known lust to be sin True 0.758 0.882 2.61
Romans 7.7 (AKJV) - 4 romans 7.7: for i had not knowen lust, except the law had said, thou shalt not couet. and therefore sayes he, i had not known lust to be sin True 0.753 0.889 1.847
Romans 7.7 (ODRV) romans 7.7: what shal we say then? is the law sinne? god forbid. but sinne i did not know, but by the law: for concupiscence i knew not, vnlesse the law did day: thou shalt not couet. and therefore sayes he, i had not known lust to be sin True 0.753 0.762 0.0
Romans 7.7 (Tyndale) - 4 romans 7.7: for i had not knowne what lust had meant excepte the lawe had sayde thou shalt not lust. and therefore sayes he, i had not known lust to be sin True 0.75 0.861 2.46
Romans 7.7 (AKJV) - 4 romans 7.7: for i had not knowen lust, except the law had said, thou shalt not couet. the law had not said, thou shalt not covet True 0.716 0.889 5.427
Romans 7.7 (Vulgate) romans 7.7: quid ergo dicemus? lex peccatum est? absit. sed peccatum non cognovi, nisi per legem: nam concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: non concupisces. and therefore sayes he, i had not known lust to be sin True 0.713 0.246 0.0
James 2.11 (ODRV) - 0 james 2.11: for he that said, thou shalt not commit aduoutrie, said also, thou shalt not kil. the law had not said, thou shalt not covet True 0.671 0.329 4.449
James 2.11 (Tyndale) james 2.11: for he that sayd. thou shallt not commit adulterie sayed also: thou shallt not kyll. though thou do none adulterie yet yf thou kill thou arte a transgresser of the lawe. the law had not said, thou shalt not covet True 0.658 0.304 0.264
James 2.11 (Geneva) - 0 james 2.11: for he that saide, thou shalt not commit adulterie, saide also, thou shalt not kill. the law had not said, thou shalt not covet True 0.654 0.438 1.267
James 2.11 (AKJV) james 2.11: for he that said, doe not commit adultery; sayd also, do not kill. now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressour of the law. the law had not said, thou shalt not covet True 0.619 0.396 3.651
Romans 7.7 (ODRV) romans 7.7: what shal we say then? is the law sinne? god forbid. but sinne i did not know, but by the law: for concupiscence i knew not, vnlesse the law did day: thou shalt not couet. the law had not said, thou shalt not covet True 0.618 0.539 3.248
Romans 7.7 (Geneva) romans 7.7: what shall we say then? is the lawe sinne? god forbid. nay, i knewe not sinne, but by the lawe: for i had not knowen lust, except the lawe had sayd, thou shalt not lust. the law had not said, thou shalt not covet True 0.604 0.789 0.701




Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment. For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation, inclusive of all its parsed components.

Location Phrase Citations Outliers
Note 0 Rom. 7.7. Romans 7.7