In-Text |
Ans. 1. Mr. Lockier if he would have made the attributum of this induction answerable to his conclusion intended, he should have said they were constitute of persons all and every one of them truely Godly, and none else. But he speaks only indefinitely, which might be granted: |
Ans. 1. Mr. Lockyer if he would have made the attributum of this induction answerable to his conclusion intended, he should have said they were constitute of Persons all and every one of them truly Godly, and none Else. But he speaks only indefinitely, which might be granted: |
np1 crd n1 jc cs pns31 vmd vhi vvn dt n1 pp-f d n1 j p-acp po31 n1 vvd, pns31 vmd vhi vvn pns32 vbdr vvi pp-f n2 d cc d crd pp-f pno32 av-j j, cc pix av. p-acp pns31 vvz av-j av-j, r-crq vmd vbi vvn: |