In-Text |
so that his speaking to Peter thus particularly must be in vain, if this Reason be not taken, to make it to purpose? Know we not that long agoe Cyprian in his treatise, de Ʋnitate Ecclesiae, has given another reason of this, which I conceive, any judicious man will think much more purpose-like then Mr. Lockiers, Quamvis (saith that Ancient of this matter) Apostolus omnibus post resurrectionem suam, parem potestatem tribuat — tamen ut unitatem manifestaret, unitatis ejusdem originem ab uno incipientem sua authoritate disposuit, hoc erant uti { que } & caeteri Apostoli quod fuit Petrus, pari consortio praediti & honoris & potestatis: |
so that his speaking to Peter thus particularly must be in vain, if this Reason be not taken, to make it to purpose? Know we not that long ago Cyprian in his treatise, de Ʋnitate Ecclesiae, has given Another reason of this, which I conceive, any judicious man will think much more purposelike then Mr. Lockiers, Quamvis (Says that Ancient of this matter) Apostles omnibus post resurrectionem suam, Parem potestatem tribuat — tamen ut unitatem manifestaret, unitatis ejusdem originem ab Uno incipientem sua authoritate disposuit, hoc Erant uti { que } & Caeteri Apostles quod fuit Peter, Pair consortio praediti & Honoris & potestatis: |
av cst po31 vvg p-acp np1 av av-j vmb vbi p-acp j, cs d n1 vbb xx vvn, pc-acp vvi pn31 p-acp n1? vvb pns12 xx d av-j av jp p-acp po31 n1, fw-fr fw-la np1, vhz vvn j-jn n1 pp-f d, r-crq pns11 vvb, d j n1 vmb vvi av-d av-dc j cs n1 n2, fw-fr (vvz d n1 pp-f d n1) np1 fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la — fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la n1, fw-la fw-la fw-la { fw-fr } cc fw-la np1 fw-la fw-la np1, fw-la fw-la fw-la cc fw-la cc fw-la: |