In-Text |
But officiall competent to him as in such a particular office amongst beleevers, or constituting him formally, such an Officer? What evidence or necessity of reason can be brought to the contrair of this? I think Mr. Lockier did wiselier to suppresse and suppose this basis of his proof, |
But official competent to him as in such a particular office among believers, or constituting him formally, such an Officer? What evidence or necessity of reason can be brought to the contrair of this? I think Mr. Lockyer did wiselier to suppress and suppose this basis of his proof, |
cc-acp j-jn j p-acp pno31 a-acp p-acp d dt j n1 p-acp n2, cc vvg pno31 av-j, d dt n1? q-crq n1 cc n1 pp-f n1 vmb vbi vvn p-acp dt j-jn pp-f d? pns11 vvb n1 jc vdd av-jc pc-acp vvi cc vvi d n1 pp-f po31 n1, |