In-Text |
and upon this score he could not (I conceive it should be, he would not, see the reason of my conjecture on the Margine) admit the Pharisees who came to him to be baptized, as is clear, comp. |
and upon this score he could not (I conceive it should be, he would not, see the reason of my conjecture on the Margin) admit the Pharisees who Come to him to be baptised, as is clear, comp. |
cc p-acp d n1 pns31 vmd xx (pns11 vvb pn31 vmd vbi, pns31 vmd xx, vvb dt n1 pp-f po11 n1 p-acp dt n1) vvb dt np2 r-crq vvd p-acp pno31 pc-acp vbi vvn, c-acp vbz j, zz. |
Note 0 |
For if it be, he could not, it must be meant de jure, as we say, illud possumus quod de jure possumus. For to deny that Physicè he could were but false & impertinent: but that were to beg the question: for now they are reasoning from his fact or practice to conclude the jus or rule, therefore knowing some of the Authors acure enough to see such a thing, I conceive, it has been first written would not, and that the other is an escape of the transcriber. |
For if it be, he could not, it must be meant de jure, as we say, illud possumus quod de jure possumus. For to deny that Physicè he could were but false & impertinent: but that were to beg the question: for now they Are reasoning from his fact or practice to conclude the jus or Rule, Therefore knowing Some of the Authors acure enough to see such a thing, I conceive, it has been First written would not, and that the other is an escape of the transcriber. |
c-acp cs pn31 vbb, pns31 vmd xx, pn31 vmb vbi vvn fw-fr fw-la, c-acp pns12 vvb, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la. p-acp pc-acp vvi d np1 pns31 vmd vbdr cc-acp j cc j: cc-acp d vbdr pc-acp vvi dt n1: c-acp av pns32 vbr vvg p-acp po31 n1 cc n1 pc-acp vvi dt fw-la cc n1, av vvg d pp-f dt n2 j av-d pc-acp vvi d dt n1, pns11 vvb, pn31 vhz vbn ord vvn vmd xx, cc d dt n-jn vbz dt n1 pp-f dt n1. |