| Galatians 3.21 (AKJV) - 2 |
galatians 3.21: for if there had beene a lawe giuen which could haue giuen life, verily righteousnesse should haue bene by the law. |
if there had been a law given, which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law, gal |
True |
0.931 |
0.962 |
3.492 |
| Galatians 3.21 (Geneva) - 2 |
galatians 3.21: for if there had bene a lawe giuen which coulde haue giuen life, surely righteousnes should haue bene by the lawe. |
if there had been a law given, which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law, gal |
True |
0.913 |
0.946 |
0.807 |
| Galatians 3.21 (ODRV) - 2 |
galatians 3.21: for if there had been a law giuen that could iustifie, vndoubtedly iustice should be of the law. |
if there had been a law given, which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law, gal |
True |
0.875 |
0.917 |
1.749 |
| Galatians 3.21 (Tyndale) |
galatians 3.21: ys the lawe then agaynst the promes of god? god forbid. how be it yf ther had bene a lawe geve which coulde have geven lyfe: then no doute rightewesnes shuld have come by the lawe. |
if there had been a law given, which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law, gal |
True |
0.813 |
0.792 |
0.0 |
| Galatians 3.21 (AKJV) - 2 |
galatians 3.21: for if there had beene a lawe giuen which could haue giuen life, verily righteousnesse should haue bene by the law. |
and place, without mixture of any sinful imperfections, what should be the reason of this alteration? if there had been a law given, which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law, gal. 3. 21. could not man keep the law of works then? it seems the first law was too strict |
False |
0.811 |
0.91 |
5.176 |
| Galatians 3.21 (Tyndale) |
galatians 3.21: ys the lawe then agaynst the promes of god? god forbid. how be it yf ther had bene a lawe geve which coulde have geven lyfe: then no doute rightewesnes shuld have come by the lawe. |
and place, without mixture of any sinful imperfections, what should be the reason of this alteration? if there had been a law given, which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law, gal. 3. 21. could not man keep the law of works then? it seems the first law was too strict |
False |
0.804 |
0.217 |
0.47 |
| Galatians 3.21 (Geneva) - 2 |
galatians 3.21: for if there had bene a lawe giuen which coulde haue giuen life, surely righteousnes should haue bene by the lawe. |
and place, without mixture of any sinful imperfections, what should be the reason of this alteration? if there had been a law given, which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law, gal. 3. 21. could not man keep the law of works then? it seems the first law was too strict |
False |
0.794 |
0.751 |
1.397 |
| Galatians 3.21 (ODRV) - 2 |
galatians 3.21: for if there had been a law giuen that could iustifie, vndoubtedly iustice should be of the law. |
and place, without mixture of any sinful imperfections, what should be the reason of this alteration? if there had been a law given, which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law, gal. 3. 21. could not man keep the law of works then? it seems the first law was too strict |
False |
0.79 |
0.472 |
4.227 |