| In-Text |
When he saith in his third and last Reason against the said distinction, That to talk of God taken only essentially is ridiculous, he clearly granteth and supposeth, that God may be taken Essentially (though not Essentially only) and consequently, that there is a divine Essence as well as a divine Person: if so, |
When he Says in his third and last Reason against the said distinction, That to talk of God taken only essentially is ridiculous, he clearly grants and Supposeth, that God may be taken Essentially (though not Essentially only) and consequently, that there is a divine Essence as well as a divine Person: if so, |
c-crq pns31 vvz p-acp po31 ord cc ord n1 p-acp dt j-vvn n1, cst pc-acp vvi pp-f np1 vvn av-j av-j vbz j, pns31 av-j vvz cc vvz, cst np1 vmb vbi vvn av-j (cs xx av-j av-j) cc av-j, cst pc-acp vbz dt j-jn n1 c-acp av c-acp dt j-jn n1: cs av, |