| In-Text |
Is it because in them the chance is applied to the determining of some thing in doubt? This indeed argueth them to be Lots, but not to be meer Lots. What then? Is it because in them we confesse God to be the onely determiner? Nor so neither: |
Is it Because in them the chance is applied to the determining of Some thing in doubt? This indeed argue them to be Lots, but not to be mere Lots. What then? Is it Because in them we confess God to be the only determiner? Nor so neither: |
vbz pn31 p-acp p-acp pno32 dt vvb vbz vvn p-acp dt vvg pp-f d n1 p-acp n1? np1 av vvz pno32 pc-acp vbi n2, p-acp xx pc-acp vbi j n2. q-crq av? vbz pn31 p-acp p-acp pno32 pns12 vvb np1 pc-acp vbi dt j n1? ccx av av-dx: |